Graham v. Connor is used to judge an officer's use of force.

Graham v. Connor is used to judge an officer's use of force.

• A. Admissibility of evidence
• B. Use of force
• C. Arrest procedures
• D. Chain of custody

Answer: (B)

Graham v. Connor sets the standard for judging whether an officer’s use of force is reasonable. The test is an objective reasonableness standard, looked at from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, with the information available at the time. It isn’t about hindsight or how the situation would be viewed later with perfect information. The evaluation weighs factors such as the severity of the alleged crime, whether the officer or others were at risk, and whether the suspect was resisting or attempting to flee. This is specifically about use of force, not about handling evidence, arrest procedures, or who kept track of physical evidence. Admissibility of evidence, arrest procedures, and chain of custody are separate concepts, so they don’t address whether the force used was reasonable.

Graham v. Connor sets the standard for judging whether an officer’s use of force is reasonable. The test is an objective reasonableness standard, looked at from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, with the information available at the time. It isn’t about hindsight or how the situation would be viewed later with perfect information. The evaluation weighs factors such as the severity of the alleged crime, whether the officer or others were at risk, and whether the suspect was resisting or attempting to flee. This is specifically about use of force, not about handling evidence, arrest procedures, or who kept track of physical evidence. Admissibility of evidence, arrest procedures, and chain of custody are separate concepts, so they don’t address whether the force used was reasonable.